IGT Facing Lawsuit for Allegedly Rigging Games

A new lawsuit filed on November 21 targets International Game Technology (IGT) and major casino operators, accusing them of deceptive practices involving Wheel of Fortune-themed electronic gaming machines. This represents other companies in this industry again becoming involved in legal matters for allegedly failing to conduct operations properly.

The plaintiffs, representing four different states, argue that the machines falsely appear to provide fair odds of winning while allegedly being programmed to favor lower payouts. The case, brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), also names MGM Resorts International, Bally’s Corporation, and Penn Entertainment as defendants.

Core of the lawsuit

• Focuses on the bonus wheel feature of Wheel of Fortune machines

• Allegation: outcomes are pre-determined by an internal computer

• Comparison: likened to a rigged roulette wheel misleading players

The Wheel of Fortune brand plays a central role in the case. Since 1997, IGT has marketed these machines heavily, renewing its licensing deal with Sony Pictures Television earlier this year. The branding, featuring hosts Vanna White and Pat Sajak along with signature sounds, is claimed to exploit trust while masking alleged rigged mechanics.

Main accusations against IGT and casinos

• Profiting billions from deceptive tactics

• Misleading players with illusions of fairness and equal odds

• Driving gambling behavior by overstating chances of high payouts

The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and demand transparent disclosure of actual odds tied to the bonus wheel feature.

Filed in the US District Court for the District of Nevada, the lawsuit also aims for class-action status and a jury trial. It alleges violations of RICO and state-level fraud laws, creating potentially significant legal consequences.

Current responses and implications

• IGT has not responded publicly to the claims

• Casinos named in the suit have also declined comment

• Industry practices around fairness and transparency face renewed scrutiny

This case highlights growing legal and ethical questions about transparency in the gaming industry. The outcome could set important precedents for consumer protection and operator accountability moving forward.