Minnesota Supreme Court backs casino expansion

How the case began

The dispute began in 2023. That year, the Minnesota Racing Commission approved changes to Running Aces Casino, Hotel and Racetrack. The plan allowed one additional dealer table supported by 11 electronic player stations. These tables use screens to help manage play while live dealers remain in control.

Soon after, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community challenged the decision. Tribal leaders argued the change crossed a legal line. According to court documents, they said the electronic tables act like gambling devices. Under state agreements, only tribes may operate video games of chance.

Arguments from both sides

The tribe warned the approval could weaken its exclusive gaming rights. These rights support healthcare, housing, education, and public services for tribal members. Leaders argued that allowing similar expansions could slowly reduce the value of state compacts.

Running Aces and the Racing Commission disagreed. They said the electronic tables do not qualify as gambling devices under Minnesota law. They also questioned whether the tribe had the legal right to challenge the approval — an issue that became central to the case.

A divided court decision

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that the tribe lacked standing. Justices agreed the compact gives tribes exclusive rights that may be affected. However, the court split on whether the Racing Commission acted improperly when approving the plan.

Because the justices were divided, an earlier ruling from the Minnesota Court of Appeals remained in effect. That ruling upheld the Commission’s decision and allowed Running Aces to move forward. It also confirmed the casino stayed within Minnesota’s 80-table limit for card clubs.

Business impact and rising concerns

From a business view, the move appears practical. Electronic tables often attract younger players familiar with digital screens. Faster play may increase daily activity and overall revenue. The expansion could also create new dealer and support roles.

Tribal leaders remain cautious. Slot-style games provide most tribal casino income. Any move that brings similar experiences to racetrack casinos could weaken compact protections over time — and shift more gaming revenue into taxable channels. Key issues shaping the debate include:

• Growth of electronic table games

• Clear limits between card play and devices

• Long-term balance between tribal and racetrack casinos

What happens next

For now, Running Aces will operate under its approved plan. The ruling settles this case but leaves larger policy questions unanswered. Minnesota’s gaming structure remains in place — though pressure around electronic gaming continues to build.