Table of content

Online Gambling Advertising Bans: Impact on the Industry and National Economies

Date Last Modified: 25 Jun, 2026

More countries are restricting online gambling ads. Some have nearly total bans, while others limit specific channels. Many initiatives address worries about gambling harm and how it affects young people.

Europe is at the forefront of regulatory changes. Comparable dialogues have arisen around the world, which highlights the lack of a single regulatory model.

As advertising rules increase, the focus shifts from limits to real-world effects. Now, it's about how these interventions affect gambling markets and if they meet their goals.

How Different Jurisdictions Regulate Gambling Advertising

Recent years have brought a wave of gambling advertising reforms across Europe. It's still hard to manage ads from international sites and social media stars. The examples below show how these rules have developed across several major markets.

Italy: A Prime Example of a Comprehensive Prohibition

Italy banned most gambling ads with the Dignity Decree in 2018. Restrictions affected all major channels, including:

  • TV  

  • Radio  

  • Print media  

  • Websites  

  • Social media  

  • Sports sponsorships.

The restrictions do not extend to every gambling-related communication. State lottery products remain exempt, and some informational content is still allowed. Even so, Italy stands out for the breadth of its advertising ban. 

Belgium: Tightening the Rules in Stages

In 2023, Belgium set new rules on gambling ads. These limits apply to television, radio, print media, public spaces, and digital channels. Sports sponsorships stayed one of the few ways operators kept visibility, but the rules got stricter.

In 2025, gambling brands were taken off the front of pro sports jerseys. Clubs can still display them, but in limited ways during the transition phase. In 2028, Belgium plans to further limit gambling sponsorship in professional sports.

Netherlands: Tightening Rules After Market Liberalization

In 2023, the Netherlands stopped untargeted gambling advertising. Now, you won’t see these ads on TV, radio, print, outdoor spaces, or other public channels. Sports sponsorships are also being phased out under existing rules.

The Dutch government recently proposed more restrictions. This is part of a five-year plan to address gambling harm. Under the proposal, licensed operators would have only a few ways to inform consumers about their services. This adds tougher protections for players and stronger actions against illegal gambling operators.

Spain: Targeting Influencers and Prime-Time Advertising

Spain tightened its gambling advertising rules in 2021 under Royal Decree 958/2020. Gambling ads largely disappeared from daytime television and radio, and operators received a limited 1 a.m.–5 a.m. window. The rules limited welcome bonuses and other promotions for new players.

Spain’s more recent proposals have focused on celebrity endorsements and influencer-led marketing. This step reflects growing worries over gambling promotion on social media.

Poland: Advertising Under Strict Conditions

Poland oversees gambling advertising under the 2009 Act on Gambling. This law restricts ads to licensed operators only. TV and radio spots are allowed only between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 

Poland’s strict rules on gambling ads impact licensed operators. They limit revenue growth and increase dependence on sports sponsorship. This also forces operators to move more of their marketing budgets to digital channels.

For years, the discussion focused mainly on operators. That changed once gambling content started spreading through social media. Several influencer cases attracted national attention, exposing the role of unlicensed operators in the market. In 2026, lawmakers introduced proposals to make promoting illegal gambling a crime. They also aimed to extend responsibility beyond just gambling companies.

Norway: Advertising Restrictions Within a State-Controlled System

Norway’s gambling market is unique; it’s state-controlled, unlike most in Europe. Only state-backed operators can legally provide most gambling products

Authorities also take steps to reduce the visibility of unlicensed operators. They monitor the media to cut down on these brands' presence. The country's advertising system aims to direct consumers toward the regulated market. 

Australia: Pressure for Broader Restrictions

Australia began its "whistle-to-whistle" gambling ad rules in 2018. These rules limit gambling ads during live sports on TV, radio, and online streaming.

The government has since proposed a broader package of reforms. Starting in January, TV betting ads will be limited to three per hour from 6 am to 8:30 pm. Also, they will not appear during live sports broadcasts in that time frame. Other planned measures include:

  • radio advertising restrictions during school pick-up and drop-off hours;

  • a ban on celebrities and athletes in gambling promotions;

  • tighter controls on online gambling advertising;

  • the removal of gambling branding from sports venues and uniforms;

  • stronger action against offshore operators.

Middle East and Parts of Asia: Advertising Bans Through Gambling Prohibition

Many of the restrictions discussed so far focus on how gambling operators can market their services. Not every country treats gambling advertising as a separate regulatory issue. 

In Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan, and Oman, gambling itself remains broadly prohibited. As a result, gambling promotion is generally prohibited as well. Authorities in these jurisdictions are still targeting offshore operators and online promotions aimed at local residents.

How Advertising Restrictions Affect the Gambling Industry

Once the above restrictions take effect, their influence extends beyond gambling advertising. These measures also influence how operators compete, attract customers, and distinguish themselves from unlicensed alternatives.

Effects on Licensed Operators

Advertising restrictions reduce the number of channels available to licensed operators. Without sponsorships and mass-market promotions, it’s harder to build brand awareness. This is especially true for companies looking to grow in a regulated market.

Changes in Market Competitiveness

Restrictions may not affect all operators equally. Established brands often have larger customer databases and stronger recognition. Newer brands rely more on advertising to reach potential customers. Some experts say this helps larger operators. It can also make it tough for new players to join the market.

Impact on Customer Acquisition

Advertising restrictions can reduce operators' ability to attract new customers. A study showed that stricter marketing rules led to a big drop in new online gambling accounts. This suggests that advertising is key to gaining customers.

Growth of the Black Market

Strict rules and total bans on gambling ads often backfire. Instead of cutting gambling interest, they can cause the black market to grow quickly. When licensed operators lose legal ways to communicate, they become hidden from the public. Meanwhile, the shadow sector rushes in, using illegal methods to promote their services. Consumers struggle to know which platforms are safe without clear marketing from licensed brands.

New rules, like ending untargeted ads and sports sponsorships, harm the key "channelization" system. The Netherlands Gaming Authority (KSA) spring report showed little growth in the legal market. Meanwhile, the black market is growing quickly

After Italy’s strict advertising ban, legal operators lost all public visibility. Reports by the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) reveal that Italian players now divert an estimated €25 billion annually into the black market. About 75% of these bets are placed on unlicensed sites that operate outside any consumer protection rules.

How Advertising Restrictions Affect National Economies

When advertising rules extend beyond single marketing channels, they can affect other areas of the economy. Governments also need to look at the economic effects of advertising restrictions. These effects can change a lot depending on the regulatory model.

Tax Revenue

Governments collect gambling taxes from licensed operators, making channelisation an important policy objective. Critics say that if licensed brands are harder to find, some players may turn to unregulated websites. This could move gambling outside the taxable market.

Driven by strict restrictions, the UK black market has grown to £16.6 billion in annual wagers. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that approximately £500 million in expected tax yield will be lost by the 2029-30 financial year.

Note

The discussion looks different in countries where gambling itself remains prohibited. These jurisdictions don't depend on gambling tax revenue. They focus on other sectors of the economy. Still, debates about offshore gambling activity continue.

Investment and Sponsorship

Sports clubs, leagues, and broadcasters have long benefited from gambling sponsorship deals. As countries tighten advertising rules, some of that investment leaves the market. This means organizations have to seek funding from other sources.

Regulators often back sponsorship restrictions. They believe that frequent exposure to gambling brands can make gambling seem normal, especially in sports. Critics say the financial impact can be significant, especially for groups relying on sponsorship income.

What Do Players Gain From Advertising Restrictions

Governments implement total gambling advertising bans to shield vulnerable citizens and halt the normalization of betting. However, global data reveals a persistent gap between legislative intent and real-world outcomes.

Effects on Problem Gambling Rates

Absolute bans remove daily calls-to-action; this leads to a big drop in impulse betting by casual players. 

However, these marketing restrictions do not cure pre-existing addiction. Total insulation is impossible in a connected world. High-frequency gamblers, with few local options, often use unregulated offshore sites. These websites don’t offer consumer protections such as deposit limits or self-exclusion tools.

Protection of Minors and Youth

A key goal of any blanket ban is to prevent kids from developing positive views on gambling. Minors often face exposure on global social media, streaming sites, and video games. Age restrictions in these areas are easy to get around.

Young people also see gambling logos when they watch international sports. This visibility makes gambling feel like a natural part of sports culture for them.

What Have Governments Achieved So Far

The goal of these policies is to create a safe "blackout" zone for vulnerable citizens. However, this goal is often not achieved. For instance, in the six months after Belgium's advertising ban, 68% of people still saw active gambling ads

Marketing bans fail when implemented in isolation. They reach their public health goals when governments impose ad restrictions and enforce them strictly. ISPs have to block certain content. If companies fail to do this, they will face heavy fines.